NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
                      MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED


                                             IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                                             OF FLORIDA
                                             SECOND DISTRICT




JEFFREY S. WILLIAMS,                         )
                                             )
             Appellant,                      )
                                             )
v.                                           )               Case No. 2D14-2393
                                             )
STATE OF FLORIDA,                            )
                                             )
             Appellee.                       )
                                             )

Opinion filed March 2, 2016.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas
County; Keith Meyer, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and
Terrence E. Kehoe, Special Assistant Public
Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,
Tallahassee, and Susan D. Dunlevy,
Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for
Appellee.




BADALAMENTI, Judge.

             Jeffrey Williams appeals his jury conviction for aggravated abuse of a

disabled adult and the imposition of a $333 discretionary fine and 5 percent surcharge.
We reverse in part and remand with instructions for the circuit court to strike the

discretionary fine pursuant to section 775.083, Florida Statutes (2011), and the five

percent surcharge pursuant to section 938.04, Florida Statutes (2011), totaling $333.

We do so because the circuit court failed to orally pronounce this discretionary statutory

fine and surcharge at the sentencing hearing. We affirm all other issues raised by

Williams without comment.

              On April 21, 2014, Williams was adjudicated guilty of aggravated abuse of

a disabled adult and sentenced to seven years' imprisonment. At sentencing the circuit

court orally pronounced the imposition of an aggregate fine of $1002. It is unclear,

however, precisely how the circuit court derived that aggregate amount. Importantly,

though, the circuit court made no mention of the discretionary statutory fine and

surcharge being challenged here. A few weeks later, the circuit court entered the

written Judgment for Fines and Costs, where it then became clear that the $1002

aggregate fine was, in part, made up of a discretionary fine and 5 percent surcharge,

totaling $333.

              Williams thereafter properly preserved a challenge to the imposition of that

$333 fine and 5 percent surcharge by filing a motion to correct sentencing error, arguing

in that motion, as he does here, that the discretionary statutory fine and surcharge

should be struck because the circuit court neglected to specify them in its oral

pronouncement. Dadds v. State, 

, 1130 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (citing Fla.

R. Crim. P. 3.800(b)(2)). Although the State agreed with the merits of the motion, the

circuit court nonetheless denied Williams's request to correct that error.




                                           -2-
             A fine imposed pursuant to section 775.083 is discretionary and must be

orally pronounced. 

; see also Lamoreaux v. State, 

, 381 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) ("A discretionary fine imposed and the statutory surcharge

on the fine must be stricken if the discretionary fine was not orally pronounced at

sentencing." (citing Pullam v. State, 

, 675 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011))).

Because the trial court did not make that oral pronouncement at the sentencing hearing,

the discretionary fine and 5 percent surcharge totaling $333 cannot stand. We thus

reverse the $333 fine and surcharge and remand with directions that they be stricken.

.

             Affirmed in part, reversed in part, remanded with directions to strike the

$333 discretionary fine and 5 percent surcharge.


SILBERMAN and BLACK, JJ., Concur.




                                           -3-