Filed: Sep. 30, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT DIANE C. SULLIVAN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D15-1397 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed September 30, 2016. Appeal from the County Court for Collier County; Vincent Murphy, Judge. Stephen M. Grogoza, Naples, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Katherine Coombs Cline, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, f
Summary: NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT DIANE C. SULLIVAN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D15-1397 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed September 30, 2016. Appeal from the County Court for Collier County; Vincent Murphy, Judge. Stephen M. Grogoza, Naples, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Katherine Coombs Cline, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, fo..
More
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT DIANE C. SULLIVAN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D15-1397 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed September 30, 2016. Appeal from the County Court for Collier County; Vincent Murphy, Judge. Stephen M. Grogoza, Naples, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Katherine Coombs Cline, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. We have for our consideration an appeal from county court where a question of great public importance was certified, and we accepted jurisdiction pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.160(e)(2). The Collier County Court, pursuant to rule 9.030(b)(4), certified the following question to this court as involving a matter of great public importance: WHETHER A SISTER STATE'S MOTOR VEHICLE RECORD, ADMITTED INTO EVIDENCE UNDER CHAPTER 90.902, FLORIDA STATUTES, IS SUFFICIENT TO ESTABLISH THE ELEMENT OF A PRIOR ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION FOR A REFUSAL TO SUBMIT TO TESTING? Upon further consideration of the parties' briefs and oral arguments, we decline to accept this appeal and do not answer the certified question. Accordingly, we transfer this appeal to the Twentieth Judicial Circuit of Florida, appellate division, pursuant to rule 9.160(f)(2). NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur. -2-