Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

J.S. v. State, 2D15-5040 (2016)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 2D15-5040 Visitors: 2
Filed: Nov. 16, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT J.S., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D15-5040 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) _ ) Opinion filed November 16, 2016. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Mark Hofstad, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Clark E. Green, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ha Thu Dao
More
              NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
                     MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED


                                             IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                                             OF FLORIDA
                                             SECOND DISTRICT



J.S.,                               )
                                    )
           Appellant,               )
                                    )
v.                                  )                  Case No. 2D15-5040
                                    )
STATE OF FLORIDA,                   )
                                    )
           Appellee.                )
___________________________________ )

Opinion filed November 16, 2016.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk
County; Mark Hofstad, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and
Clark E. Green, Assistant Public Defender,
Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,
Tallahassee, and Ha Thu Dao, Assistant
Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.



PER CURIAM.

             J.S., a juvenile, timely appeals his disposition and continued probation in

several case numbers. We affirm in all respects but remand for the trial court to amend

the order of probation to conform to the oral pronouncement. See C.M. v. State, 
170 So. 3d 855
, 856 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) ("If a discrepancy exists between the written
[disposition] and the oral pronouncement, the written [disposition] must be corrected to

conform to the oral pronouncement." (alterations in original) (quoting W.S.G. v. State,

32 So. 3d 725
, 726 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010))).

              The court orally sentenced J.S. to a probationary period of either three

years or until J.S.'s nineteenth birthday, whichever comes first. However, the written

order of probation does not make clear that the probationary period must end when J.S.

turns nineteen. See ยง 985.0301(5)(b)(1) (2015) (providing that the juvenile court shall

retain jurisdiction over a child on probation until the court relinquishes jurisdiction or the

child reaches nineteen years of age). Accordingly, the order of probation must be

amended to conform to the orally imposed sentence.

              Affirmed and remanded with instructions.


WALLACE, KHOUZAM, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.




                                             -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer