Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Thomas Petrovsky a/k/a Thomas J. Petrovsky and Nancy Petrovsky a/k/a Nancy R. Petrovsky v. HSBC Bank, USA, etc., 4D14-1485 (2016)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 4D14-1485 Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 17, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT THOMAS PETROVSKY a/k/a Thomas J. Petrovsky and NANCY PETROVSKY a/k/a Nancy R. Petrovsky, Appellants, v. HSBC BANK, USA, as Indenture Trustee for Friedman, Billings, Ramsey Group, Inc. (FBR) Securitization Name - FBRSI 2005-2, ANY AND ALL UNKNOWN PARTIES CLAIMING BY, THROUGH, UNDER, AND AGAINST THE HEREIN NAMED INDIVIDUAL WHO ARE NOT KNOWN TO BE DEAD OR ALIVE, WHETHER SAID UNKNOWN PARTIES MAY CLAIM AN INTEREST AS SPOUSES, HEIRS, DEV
More
        DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                            FOURTH DISTRICT

    THOMAS PETROVSKY a/k/a Thomas J. Petrovsky and NANCY
            PETROVSKY a/k/a Nancy R. Petrovsky,
                       Appellants,

                                   v.

HSBC BANK, USA, as Indenture Trustee for Friedman, Billings, Ramsey
 Group, Inc. (FBR) Securitization Name - FBRSI 2005-2, ANY AND ALL
   UNKNOWN PARTIES CLAIMING BY, THROUGH, UNDER, AND
AGAINST THE HEREIN NAMED INDIVIDUAL WHO ARE NOT KNOWN
TO BE DEAD OR ALIVE, WHETHER SAID UNKNOWN PARTIES MAY
CLAIM AN INTEREST AS SPOUSES, HEIRS, DEVISEES, GRANTEES,
  OR OTHER CLAIMANTS, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., TENANT #1,
              TENANT #2, TENANT #3, and TENANT #4,
                                Appellees.

                            No. 4D14-1485

                          [February 17, 2016]

  Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm
Beach County; Lucy Chernow Brown, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2008-CA-
008391 XXXXMB.

   Thomas Erskine Ice of Ice Appellate, Royal Palm Beach, for appellants.

    Joseph D. Wargo and Susan Capote of Wargo & French, LLP, Miami,
for appellee HSBC Bank, USA.

LEVINE, J.

    Appellants appeal a final judgment of foreclosure entered in favor of
HSBC Bank. We find HSBC proved standing as the holder of the note
because the allonge containing the blank endorsement was sufficiently
affixed to the note. See Purificato v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC, 
41 Fla. L
.
Weekly 64331 (Fla. 4th DCA Jan. 6, 2016). We also find no error in the
admission of HSBC’s exhibits under the business record exception to the
hearsay rule.

    However, we reverse the portion of the final judgment awarding
attorney’s fees without an evidentiary hearing. “‘Reasonable attorney’s
fees’ generally are not liquidated damages and require a hearing. Absent
an evidentiary hearing, the fee award will be reversed for a hearing unless
there is an indication that the right to a hearing was waived.” Zumpf v.
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 
43 So. 3d 764
, 766 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)
(citation omitted); see also Roggemann v. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co.,
670 So. 2d 1073
, 1075 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

   After the trial court orally ruled in favor of HSBC, appellants requested
an evidentiary hearing to determine a reasonable amount of attorney’s
fees. HSBC claimed that during trial it asked the court to take judicial
notice that it filed an affidavit of attorney’s fees, and appellants did not
raise any objection. The court found that appellants waived their right to
an evidentiary hearing.

   Contrary to the trial court’s finding, appellants did not waive their right
to an evidentiary hearing on attorney’s fees. During trial, HSBC merely
referred to the fact that it had filed attorney’s fees affidavits. HSBC did
not request that the court take judicial notice of the affidavits. Moreover,
the affidavits were not introduced as an exhibit at trial. By requesting that
the court hold an evidentiary hearing on the issue of attorney’s fees,
appellants preserved their right to a hearing.

    In Diwakar v. Montecito Palm Beach Condominium Ass’n, 
143 So. 3d 958
(Fla. 4th DCA 2014), the bank filed an affidavit of attorney’s fees before
trial, but the affidavit was not admitted into evidence during trial. This
court found the evidence insufficient to support the attorney’s fee award,
and reversed and remanded for the trial court to take additional evidence
on attorney’s fees. Similarly, in Wagner v. Bank of America, N.A., 
143 So. 3d
447, 448 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014), the court remanded for an evidentiary
hearing on the amount of attorney’s fees where the only evidence of fees
was an affidavit filed by the bank prior to trial.

   Like in Diwakar and Wagner, the attorney’s fees affidavits HSBC filed
before trial were insufficient to support the fee award. Accordingly, we
reverse the portion of the final judgment awarding attorney’s fees, and
remand for the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing thereon.

   Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

GROSS and WARNER, JJ., concur.

                            *         *         *

   Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                                      2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer