Filed: Oct. 10, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED SCOTT LEVINE, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D15-3130 BONNIE STIMMEL, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed October 14, 2016 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Donald A. Myers, Jr., Judge. Christopher V. Carlyle, and John N. Bogdanoff, of the Carlyle Appellate Law Firm, The Villages, for Appellant. Alexander S. Douglas, II, and Robert Clayt
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED SCOTT LEVINE, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D15-3130 BONNIE STIMMEL, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed October 14, 2016 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Donald A. Myers, Jr., Judge. Christopher V. Carlyle, and John N. Bogdanoff, of the Carlyle Appellate Law Firm, The Villages, for Appellant. Alexander S. Douglas, II, and Robert Clayto..
More
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED SCOTT LEVINE, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D15-3130 BONNIE STIMMEL, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed October 14, 2016 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Donald A. Myers, Jr., Judge. Christopher V. Carlyle, and John N. Bogdanoff, of the Carlyle Appellate Law Firm, The Villages, for Appellant. Alexander S. Douglas, II, and Robert Clayton Roesch, of Shuffield, Lowman & Wilson, P.A, Orlando, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. We have carefully considered the arguments raised by the parties and the record before the court. We commend the trial court for preparing a thorough, thoughtful final judgment that includes a detailed review of the evidence, findings of fact, discussion of witness credibility, and conclusions of law. The trial court’s findings are supported by competent substantial evidence, and we find no legal error. Accordingly, we affirm the final judgment. AFFIRMED. SAWAYA, TORPY and EDWARDS, JJ., concur. 2
