Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

KATHYA WEIMAR v. L'Oreal USA S/D, Inc. D/B/A Urban Decay, 15-3529 (2017)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 15-3529 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jan. 22, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA KATHYA WEIMAR, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D15-3529 L'OREAL USA S/D, INC. D/B/A URBAN DECAY et al., Appellee. _/ Opinion filed January 23, 2017. An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims . E. Douglas Spangler, Jr., Judge. Kimberly A. Hill, Kimberly A. Hill, P.L., Fort Lauderdale, and Richard Zaldivar, Richard E. Zaldivar, P.A.,
More
                                        IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                                        FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

KATHYA WEIMAR,                          NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
                                        FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
      Appellant,                        DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v.                                      CASE NO. 1D15-3529

L'OREAL USA S/D, INC. D/B/A
URBAN DECAY et al.,

      Appellee.


_____________________________/

Opinion filed January 23, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims .
E. Douglas Spangler, Jr., Judge.

Kimberly A. Hill, Kimberly A. Hill, P.L., Fort Lauderdale, and Richard Zaldivar,
Richard E. Zaldivar, P.A., Miami, for Appellant.

Jennifer J. Kennedy, Abbey, Adams, Byelick, & Mueller, L.L.P., St. Petersburg, for
Appellee.


PER CURIAM.


      The court having received the September 6, 2016, order of the Supreme Court

of Florida quashing this court’s opinion of November 5, 2015, and remanding the

matter for reconsideration upon application of Castellanos v. Next Door Co., 
192 So. 3d 431
(Fla. 2016), and finding that reversal is warranted in light of that opinion,
the order of the Judge of Compensation Claims is REVERSED, and this case is

REMANDED for proceedings consistent with that opinion.



     REVERSED and REMANDED.

RAY, OSTERHAUS, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.




                                     2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer