Filed: Jan. 22, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA KATHYA WEIMAR, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D15-3529 L'OREAL USA S/D, INC. D/B/A URBAN DECAY et al., Appellee. _/ Opinion filed January 23, 2017. An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims . E. Douglas Spangler, Jr., Judge. Kimberly A. Hill, Kimberly A. Hill, P.L., Fort Lauderdale, and Richard Zaldivar, Richard E. Zaldivar, P.A.,
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA KATHYA WEIMAR, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D15-3529 L'OREAL USA S/D, INC. D/B/A URBAN DECAY et al., Appellee. _/ Opinion filed January 23, 2017. An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims . E. Douglas Spangler, Jr., Judge. Kimberly A. Hill, Kimberly A. Hill, P.L., Fort Lauderdale, and Richard Zaldivar, Richard E. Zaldivar, P.A., M..
More
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
KATHYA WEIMAR, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
v. CASE NO. 1D15-3529
L'OREAL USA S/D, INC. D/B/A
URBAN DECAY et al.,
Appellee.
_____________________________/
Opinion filed January 23, 2017.
An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims .
E. Douglas Spangler, Jr., Judge.
Kimberly A. Hill, Kimberly A. Hill, P.L., Fort Lauderdale, and Richard Zaldivar,
Richard E. Zaldivar, P.A., Miami, for Appellant.
Jennifer J. Kennedy, Abbey, Adams, Byelick, & Mueller, L.L.P., St. Petersburg, for
Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The court having received the September 6, 2016, order of the Supreme Court
of Florida quashing this court’s opinion of November 5, 2015, and remanding the
matter for reconsideration upon application of Castellanos v. Next Door Co.,
192
So. 3d 431 (Fla. 2016), and finding that reversal is warranted in light of that opinion,
the order of the Judge of Compensation Claims is REVERSED, and this case is
REMANDED for proceedings consistent with that opinion.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
RAY, OSTERHAUS, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.
2