Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Joshua Dukes v. State of Florida, 15-4032 (2017)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 15-4032 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jul. 10, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA JOSHUA DUKES, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D15-4032 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed July 11, 2017. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Jack M. Schemer, Judge. Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Victor D. Holder, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kathryn Lane, As
More
                                      IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                                      FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

JOSHUA DUKES,                         NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
                                      FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
      Appellant,                      DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v.                                    CASE NO. 1D15-4032

STATE OF FLORIDA,

      Appellee.

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 11, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.
Jack M. Schemer, Judge.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Victor D. Holder, Assistant Public Defender,
Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kathryn Lane, Assistant Attorney General,
Tallahassee, for Appellee.


        ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND WRITTEN OPINION

PER CURIUM.

      On consideration of the motion for rehearing and written opinion, this Court

grants, in part, the motion. We grant the motion solely with respect to Appellant’s

request for remand regarding resentencing. The record indicates the trial court may

have felt constrained to impose the mandatory minimum sentences consecutively.
Pursuant to Williams v. State, 
186 So. 3d 989
, 993 (Fla. 2016), where “multiple

firearm offenses are committed contemporaneously, during which multiple victims

are shot at, then consecutive sentencing is permissible but not mandatory.”

(Emphasis added.) Accordingly, on remand the trial court is permitted to impose

the same sentence but is not required to do so.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., WETHERELL, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer