Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Femi Adeoye v. State of Florida, 16-5707 (2017)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 16-5707 Visitors: 11
Filed: Apr. 03, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA FEMI ADEOYE, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D16-5707 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed April 4, 2017. An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Leon County. Angela C. Dempsey, Judge. Femi Adeoye, pro se, Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Criminal Appeals, Tallahassee, for Appellee. P
More
                                     IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                                     FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

FEMI ADEOYE,                         NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
                                     FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
      Appellant,                     DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v.                                   CASE NO. 1D16-5707

STATE OF FLORIDA,

      Appellee.

_____________________________/

Opinion filed April 4, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Leon County.
Angela C. Dempsey, Judge.

Femi Adeoye, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief,
Criminal Appeals, Tallahassee, for Appellee.




PER CURIAM.

      Appellant seeks review of the circuit court’s December 9, 2016, Order

Denying Motion to Correct Sentencing Error, which treated appellant’s motion as

seeking relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Because
appellant’s direct appeal of judgment and sentence is pending,1 the trial court was

without jurisdiction to rule on appellant’s motion. See Buckhalter v. State, 
168 So. 3d
348 (Fla. 1st DCA2015).

      Accordingly, we quash the order denying appellant’s motion.

      ORDER QUASHED.

ROBERTS, C. J., LEWIS and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.




1
  The trial court concluded that no appeal was pending at the time appellant filed
the motion to correct sentencing error because appellant’s pro se appeal,
proceeding under case number 1D16-3666, was dismissed by the Court on October
20, 2016. However, the appeal of appellant’s judgment and sentence remains
pending in case number 1D16-3432.

                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer