Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Fuller v. Sandler N/K/A Kempler, 17-0076 (2017)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 17-0076 Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 18, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed October 18, 2017. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. _ No. 3D17-76 Lower Tribunal No. 12-15364 _ Joshua Luther Fuller, Appellant, vs. Shelby Sandler n/k/a Shelby Kempler, Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Valerie R. Manno Schurr, Judge. Marks & West, P.A., and Evan R. Marks and Carolyn W. West, for appellant. Berger Singerman LLP, and Kathleen S. Phang and David Archer, fo
More
      Third District Court of Appeal
                              State of Florida

                        Opinion filed October 18, 2017.
        Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

                              ________________

                               No. 3D17-76
                        Lower Tribunal No. 12-15364
                            ________________


                          Joshua Luther Fuller,
                                   Appellant,

                                       vs.

                Shelby Sandler n/k/a Shelby Kempler,
                                   Appellee.



    An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Valerie R.
Manno Schurr, Judge.

      Marks & West, P.A., and Evan R. Marks and Carolyn W. West, for
appellant.

      Berger Singerman LLP, and Kathleen S. Phang and David Archer, for
appellee.


Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SUAREZ and SALTER, JJ.

     ROTHENBERG, C.J.
      The former husband, Joshua Luther Fuller, appeals from an order denying

his motion to vacate and for relief from a temporary stay away order. The denial

was without prejudice to allow the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing on

the former husband’s motion. Because the order appealed is a non-final, non-

appealable order, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand to the

trial court to conduct the evidentiary hearing. See Lamothe v. Sellars, 
695 So. 2d 1259
, 1260 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (holding that stay away orders are not injunctions,

but rather “protective or case management orders being used by the court to

control the proceedings before it,” and therefore, stay away orders are not

reviewable pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(B), which

authorizes review of non-final orders granting injunctions).

      Dismissed and remanded.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer