Filed: Mar. 19, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO CLINICS, INC., FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Appellant, CASE NO. 1D17-0258 v. STATE OF FLORIDA, EX. REL., DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES OF FLORIDA IN RE: THE RECEIVERSHIP OF QUALITY HEALTH PLANS, INC., Appellees. _/ Opinion filed March 20, 2017. An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Leon County. Charles W. Dodson, Judge. Richard H. Levenst
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO CLINICS, INC., FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Appellant, CASE NO. 1D17-0258 v. STATE OF FLORIDA, EX. REL., DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES OF FLORIDA IN RE: THE RECEIVERSHIP OF QUALITY HEALTH PLANS, INC., Appellees. _/ Opinion filed March 20, 2017. An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Leon County. Charles W. Dodson, Judge. Richard H. Levenste..
More
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
UNIVERSITY MEDICAL NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
CLINICS, INC., FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
Appellant,
CASE NO. 1D17-0258
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, EX.
REL., DEPARTMENT OF
FINANCIAL SERVICES OF
FLORIDA IN RE: THE
RECEIVERSHIP OF QUALITY
HEALTH PLANS, INC.,
Appellees.
_____________________________/
Opinion filed March 20, 2017.
An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Leon County.
Charles W. Dodson, Judge.
Richard H. Levenstein of Kramer, Sopko & Levenstein, P.A., Stuart, for Appellant.
No appearance for Appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The Court has determined that the Order on University Medical Clinics,
Inc.’s Claim Objection as to Class Priority is not a final order. Accordingly, the
appeal is dismissed. Because an indeterminate amount of judicial labor is required
by the lower tribunal to determine the amount of appellant’s claim, the Court
declines to stay the appellate proceeding as requested by appellant in its response
to the Court’s February 20, 2017, order. See Demont v. Demont, 24 So. 3d 699
(Fla. 1st DCA 2009).
B.L. THOMAS, BILBREY, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
2
