Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Bowman v. State, 2D16-5303 (2017)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 2D16-5303 Visitors: 1
Filed: Sep. 01, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT BRITTANY BOWMAN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-5303 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) _ ) Opinion filed September 1, 2017. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Tom Barber, Judge. Brittany Bowman, pro se. LaROSE, Chief Judge. Affirmed without prejudice to whatever right the appellant may have
More
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT BRITTANY BOWMAN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-5303 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________ ) Opinion filed September 1, 2017. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Tom Barber, Judge. Brittany Bowman, pro se. LaROSE, Chief Judge. Affirmed without prejudice to whatever right the appellant may have to file a timely and facially sufficient motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. NORTHCUTT and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer