Filed: Mar. 06, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED MARYSELY GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D16-1346 GUILLERMO HEWITT, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed March 10, 2017 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County, Mark J. Hill, Judge. Brandon M. Tyson, of Tyson Law Firm, LLC, Altamonte Springs, for Appellant. No Appearance for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Marysely Gonzalez (“Mother”) appeals the d
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED MARYSELY GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D16-1346 GUILLERMO HEWITT, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed March 10, 2017 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County, Mark J. Hill, Judge. Brandon M. Tyson, of Tyson Law Firm, LLC, Altamonte Springs, for Appellant. No Appearance for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Marysely Gonzalez (“Mother”) appeals the de..
More
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED MARYSELY GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D16-1346 GUILLERMO HEWITT, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed March 10, 2017 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County, Mark J. Hill, Judge. Brandon M. Tyson, of Tyson Law Firm, LLC, Altamonte Springs, for Appellant. No Appearance for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Marysely Gonzalez (“Mother”) appeals the default final judgment of paternity, contending that the trial court erred in summarily denying her motion to set aside the default judgment without an evidentiary hearing regarding her allegations of excusable neglect. We agree. We therefore reverse the judgment and remand with instructions to hold an evidentiary hearing on Mother’s motion to vacate. We also note that the trial court erred in failing to make appropriate findings regarding the best interest of the child pursuant to section 61.13(3), Florida Statutes (2016), and by failing to include an explanation of the method by which Mother can establish timesharing with the child. REVERSED and REMANDED. SAWAYA and BERGER, JJ., and JACOBUS, B.W., Senior Judge, concur. 2
