IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                              FIFTH DISTRICT

                                                NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
                                                FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
                                                DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED


BROSNAN PEARSON HART,

             Appellant,

 v.                                                    Case No. 5D16-3050

STATE OF FLORIDA,

             Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed March 24, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court
for Marion County,
Anthony M. Tatti, Judge.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and
Sean K. Gravel, Assistant Public Defender,
Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,
Tallahassee, and Allison Leigh Morris,
Assistant Attorney General, Daytona
Beach, for Appellee.


PER CURIAM.

      Brosnan Pearson Hart (“Appellant”) correctly asserts, and the State agrees, that if

he was indigent, he was entitled to the appointment of counsel to assist him in the

preparation of a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170 motion to withdraw his guilty

pleas to attempted first-degree murder and robbery with a firearm.        Appellant was
represented by privately retained counsel at the plea hearing. The trial court confirmed

during a thorough plea colloquy that Appellant understood the charges, that he had

discussed the case with his counsel, and that he was freely and voluntarily pleading guilty.

He was sentenced, as agreed, to two concurrent sentences of fifteen years in prison with

a ten year minimum mandatory sentence for possession of a firearm, to be followed by

ten years of probation.

       Appellant’s privately retained counsel moved to withdraw from representation

twenty eight days after the sentencing hearing, and the motion was granted. On the same

day counsel was permitted to withdraw, Appellant, then seventeen years old, drafted and

mailed a motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. The record on appeal does not indicate that

Appellant requested or was offered counsel. A hearing was held and the trial court denied

Appellant’s pro se motion. The court also denied a subsequent motion to withdraw the

guilty pleas.

       Appellant argues and the State concedes that a rule 3.170 motion to withdraw plea

is a critical stage of the proceeding, entitling the defendant to representation and

assistance of counsel. Tipler v. State, 

, 1193 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014). An

indigent defendant is entitled to the appointment of counsel. See e.g., Searcy v. State,

, 1011 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (“Many courts have held, and we agree, that

an indigent defendant has the right to court-appointed counsel to assist in the filing of a

[rule 3.170] motion.”). If counsel withdraws before a rule 3.170 motion is filed, then

counsel must be offered to an indigent defendant. 

. Although

Appellant had privately retained counsel at the plea and sentencing hearings, the trial

court appointed counsel to represent him on appeal. We remand this case to the trial




                                             2
court to determine whether Appellant was indigent during the time he filed, or could have

timely filed, a motion to withdraw his pleas. If the trial court determines that Appellant

was indigent, it shall set aside its previous orders denying Appellant’s motions to withdraw

his pleas, appoint counsel for the purpose of filing a motion to withdraw pleas should

Appellant desire to so proceed, and conduct a new hearing on Appellant’s motion to

withdraw his guilty pleas.

       REVERSED AND REMANDED with instructions.




PALMER and EDWARDS, JJ., and JACOBUS, B.W., Senior Judge, concur.




                                             3