Filed: Oct. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT THANH-THUY THI LE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-2959 ) DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST ) COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR MORGAN ) STANLEY ABS CAPITAL 1 INC. TRUST ) 2006-WMC2 MORTGAGE PASS- ) THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES ) 2006-WMC2, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed October 26, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Perry A. Little, Senior
Summary: NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT THANH-THUY THI LE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-2959 ) DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST ) COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR MORGAN ) STANLEY ABS CAPITAL 1 INC. TRUST ) 2006-WMC2 MORTGAGE PASS- ) THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES ) 2006-WMC2, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed October 26, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Perry A. Little, Senior J..
More
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
THANH-THUY THI LE, )
)
Appellant, )
)
v. ) Case No. 2D17-2959
)
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST )
COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR MORGAN )
STANLEY ABS CAPITAL 1 INC. TRUST )
2006-WMC2 MORTGAGE PASS- )
THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES )
2006-WMC2, )
)
Appellee. )
)
Opinion filed October 26, 2018.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for
Hillsborough County; Perry A. Little,
Senior Judge.
Thanh-Thuy Thi Le, pro se.
Melissa A. Giasi and Richard S. McIver of
Kass Shuler, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Thanh-Thuy Thi Le, pro se, challenges (1) the trial court's order denying
her motion for relief from a 2014 foreclosure judgment entered in favor of Deutsche
Bank National Trust Company in August 2014, (2) the trial court's order denying
rehearing of its denial of the motion for relief from judgment, and (3) the trial court's
order granting the bank's motion to reset the foreclosure sale. We affirm the denials of
the motion to vacate and the motion for rehearing without further comment. And we
dismiss the portion of this appeal that attempts to challenge the order resetting the
foreclosure sale as it is not an appealable order. See Pridgen v. First Union Bank,
879
So. 2d 21, 21 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) ("An order that merely schedules a foreclosure sale is
not a final appealable order. Rather, it is a purely administrative, interlocutory step in
the judicial sales process.").
Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.
MORRIS, SLEET, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
-2-