Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

LEWIS JOHNSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA, 17-3122 (2018)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 17-3122 Visitors: 2
Filed: May 02, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT LEWIS JOHNSON, ) a/k/a LEWIS EDWARD JOHNSON, JR., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3122 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed May 2, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County; William D. Sites, Judge. Ita M. Neymotin, Regional Counsel, Second District, and Byron P. Hileman, Assistant Regiona
More
               NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
                      MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED


                                              IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                                              OF FLORIDA
                                              SECOND DISTRICT



LEWIS JOHNSON,                                )
a/k/a LEWIS EDWARD JOHNSON, JR.,              )
                                              )
              Appellant,                      )
                                              )
v.                                            )       Case No. 2D17-3122
                                              )
STATE OF FLORIDA,                             )
                                              )
              Appellee.                       )
                                              )

Opinion filed May 2, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.
9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk
County; William D. Sites, Judge.

Ita M. Neymotin, Regional Counsel, Second
District, and Byron P. Hileman, Assistant
Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal
Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel,
Bartow, for Appellant.


VILLANTI, Judge.


              Lewis Johnson appeals the order denying his motion to correct illegal

sentence filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We must reverse.

              In 1979, Johnson, a juvenile at the time of his crime, was sentenced under

section 39.111(6), Florida Statutes (1978), which required the sentencing court to make
a "suitability determination" regarding the imposition of adult sanctions but which did not

require consideration of the individualized factors now required by Miller v. Alabama,

567 U.S. 460
(2012). Because this earlier statute did not afford the trial court the

discretion to consider "how children are different, and how those differences counsel

against irrevocably sentencing them to a lifetime in prison," as now required by 
Miller, 567 U.S. at 480
, we must reverse and remand for a new sentencing hearing. See

Atwell v. State, 
197 So. 3d 1040
, 1050 (Fla. 2016) (holding that "[t]he only way to

correct [the juvenile]'s sentence, consistent with this Court's case law in Horsley[ v.

State, 
160 So. 3d 393
(Fla. 2015)], is to resentence [the juvenile] in conformance with

chapter 2014-220, Laws of Florida"); Wells v. State, 
208 So. 3d 1235
, 1236 (Fla. 2d

DCA 2017) (same). On remand, Johnson is entitled to the full panoply of rights

necessary at a resentencing.

              Reversed and remanded for resentencing.



SLEET and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.




                                            -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer