Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

PROGRESSIVE SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY v. LLOYDS OF SHELTON AUTO GLASS, LLC, 17-3657 (2018)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 17-3657 Visitors: 16
Filed: Oct. 31, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT PROGRESSIVE SELECT INSURANCE ) COMPANY, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3657 ) LLOYD'S OF SHELTON AUTO GLASS, ) LLC, a/a/o JEDIDIAH THOMAS, ) ) Respondent. ) ) Opinion filed October 31, 2018. Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit for Hillsborough County; sitting in its appellate capacity. Alexandra Val
More
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT PROGRESSIVE SELECT INSURANCE ) COMPANY, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3657 ) LLOYD'S OF SHELTON AUTO GLASS, ) LLC, a/a/o JEDIDIAH THOMAS, ) ) Respondent. ) ) Opinion filed October 31, 2018. Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit for Hillsborough County; sitting in its appellate capacity. Alexandra Valdes of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Miami, for Petitioner. Kristin A. Norse and Stuart C. Markman of Kynes, Markman & Felman, P.A., Tampa; David M. Caldevilla of de la Parte & Gilbert, P.A., Tampa; and John C. Murrow of Law Office of John C. Murrow, P.A., Tampa, for Respondent. MORRIS, Judge. The petitioner, Progressive Select Insurance Company, seeks a second- tier writ of certiorari to quash the circuit court's order that denied Progressive's petition for writ of certiorari below. While involving different parties, the facts and procedural history of this case are nearly identical to the facts and procedural history of another second-tier certiorari proceeding that is traveling with this case, Progressive American Insurance Co. v. SHL Enterprises, LLC, a/a/o Shazam Auto Glass, LLC, 2D17-4074. We quashed the order in SHL Enterprises, LLC, a/a/o Shazam Auto Glass, LLC, wherein the circuit court had adopted the reasoning of the circuit court's order that was entered in this case. Thus, for the reasons we explained in SHL Enterprises, LLC, a/a/o Shazam Auto Glass, LLC, we quash the circuit court's order here. Petition granted; order quashed. SILBERMAN and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur. -2-
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer