Filed: Apr. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _ No. 1D17-4150 _ COLUMBIA BANK, Appellant, v. BARRY D. JOYE; LURONDA S. JOYE; GREATER SOUTHEASTERN LAND DEVELOPMENT, LLC; BRUCE NAYLOR; GARY SORENSEN; SOUTHEASTERN PAVING & CONSTRUCTION, LLC; TONY D. RICHARDS; and DONALD K. JOYE, Appellees. _ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County. E. Bailey Browning, III, Judge. April 30, 2018 PER CURIAM. Upon consideration of Appellant’s response to the Court’s order of October 20, 2017, the Court
Summary: FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _ No. 1D17-4150 _ COLUMBIA BANK, Appellant, v. BARRY D. JOYE; LURONDA S. JOYE; GREATER SOUTHEASTERN LAND DEVELOPMENT, LLC; BRUCE NAYLOR; GARY SORENSEN; SOUTHEASTERN PAVING & CONSTRUCTION, LLC; TONY D. RICHARDS; and DONALD K. JOYE, Appellees. _ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County. E. Bailey Browning, III, Judge. April 30, 2018 PER CURIAM. Upon consideration of Appellant’s response to the Court’s order of October 20, 2017, the Court h..
More
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D17-4150
_____________________________
COLUMBIA BANK,
Appellant,
v.
BARRY D. JOYE; LURONDA S.
JOYE; GREATER SOUTHEASTERN
LAND DEVELOPMENT, LLC;
BRUCE NAYLOR; GARY
SORENSEN; SOUTHEASTERN
PAVING & CONSTRUCTION, LLC;
TONY D. RICHARDS; and DONALD
K. JOYE,
Appellees.
_____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County.
E. Bailey Browning, III, Judge.
April 30, 2018
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of Appellant’s response to the Court’s
order of October 20, 2017, the Court has determined that the
order on appeal is not a final order or appealable non-final order.
We, therefore, dismiss the appeal.
Appellant seeks review of an order granting a motion to
dismiss its amended counterclaim. We dismiss the appeal for two
reasons. First, the order grants a motion to dismiss without
actually dismissing. An order that merely grants a motion to
dismiss or a motion for summary judgment, but that does not
enter judgment on the motion, or otherwise qualify as a
judgment, is not a final appealable order. See Dedge v. Crosby,
914 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).
Second, the order is not presently appealable because
counterclaims and cross-claims, related to the claims addressed
in the order on appeal, remain pending. Jensen v. Whetstine,
985
So. 2d 1218, 1220-1221 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (dismissing appeal
from order that did not dispose of remaining claims involving
related facts); Northcutt v. Pathway Fin.,
555 So. 2d 368 (Fla. 3d
DCA 1989) (holding interrelatedness depends on “whether there
is a factual and legal overlap between the claims”).
The dismissal is without prejudice to seeking review upon
rendition of a final order that disposes of all claims, including the
pending, related counterclaims and cross-claims.
ROBERTS, KELSEY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
Nicholas V. Pulignano, Jr. and Meagan L. Logan, of Marks Gray,
P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant.
Adam L. Morrison of Sellers, Taylor & Morrison, P.A., Live Oak,
for Appellee Gary Sorensen.
No appearances for Appellees Barry D. Joye, Donald K. Joye,
Luronda S. Joye, Greater Southeastern Land Development, LLC,
Bruce Naylor, Southeastern Paving & Construction, LLC, or Tony
D. Richards.
2