Filed: Mar. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _ No. 1D17-5299 _ PREMIER MOTORCAR GALLERY, INC., Petitioner, v. ONAZINA WASHINGTON, Respondent. _ Petition for Writ of Prohibition–Original Jurisdiction. March 29, 2018 PER CURIAM. Premier Motorcar Gallery, Inc., filed a petition for prohibition, asking us to prohibit the circuit court from exercising jurisdiction in the underlying matter. Later, while this original action remained pending, Premier Motorcar removed the underlying action to federal
Summary: FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _ No. 1D17-5299 _ PREMIER MOTORCAR GALLERY, INC., Petitioner, v. ONAZINA WASHINGTON, Respondent. _ Petition for Writ of Prohibition–Original Jurisdiction. March 29, 2018 PER CURIAM. Premier Motorcar Gallery, Inc., filed a petition for prohibition, asking us to prohibit the circuit court from exercising jurisdiction in the underlying matter. Later, while this original action remained pending, Premier Motorcar removed the underlying action to federal ..
More
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D17-5299
_____________________________
PREMIER MOTORCAR GALLERY,
INC.,
Petitioner,
v.
ONAZINA WASHINGTON,
Respondent.
_____________________________
Petition for Writ of Prohibition–Original Jurisdiction.
March 29, 2018
PER CURIAM.
Premier Motorcar Gallery, Inc., filed a petition for
prohibition, asking us to prohibit the circuit court from exercising
jurisdiction in the underlying matter. Later, while this original
action remained pending, Premier Motorcar removed the
underlying action to federal court, thus depriving the trial court
of jurisdiction to proceed. See Maseda v. Honda Motor Co.,
861
F.2d 1248, 1254–55 (11th Cir.1988) (“[A]fter removal, the
jurisdiction of the state court absolutely ceases and the state
court has a duty not to proceed any further in the case.”); see also
28 U.S.C. § 1446(d) (“[T]he State court shall proceed no further
unless and until the case is remanded.”).
Premier Motorcar now asks us to stay or abate this
proceeding, waiting and starting again “only in the event the
action is later remanded” back to state court. But because
Premier Motorcar acknowledges that its removal to federal court
has already achieved what it asked us to do—deprive the circuit
court of jurisdiction to proceed—we dismiss the petition as moot.
If the case later returns to state court, and if the trial court later
acts in excess of its jurisdiction, Premier Motorcar can later file
another prohibition petition. See Scott v. Francati,
214 So. 3d
742, 749 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (prohibition is appropriate when
circuit court attempts to act without jurisdiction).
DISMISSED.
WOLF, OSTERHAUS, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
David P. Healy of Dudley, Sellers, Healy & Heath, PL,
Tallahassee, for Petitioner.
David H. Abrams, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
2