Filed: Nov. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed November 16, 2018. _ No. 3D18-2283 Lower Tribunal No. 18-17151 _ Aljamar Grant, Petitioner, vs. The State of Florida, Respondent. A Case of Original Jurisdiction – Habeas Corpus. Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Jeffrey Paul DeSousa, Assistant Public Defender, for petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. Before LAGOA, LOGUE, and SCALES, JJ. PER CURIAM. Aljama
Summary: Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed November 16, 2018. _ No. 3D18-2283 Lower Tribunal No. 18-17151 _ Aljamar Grant, Petitioner, vs. The State of Florida, Respondent. A Case of Original Jurisdiction – Habeas Corpus. Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Jeffrey Paul DeSousa, Assistant Public Defender, for petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. Before LAGOA, LOGUE, and SCALES, JJ. PER CURIAM. Aljamar..
More
Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed November 16, 2018.
________________
No. 3D18-2283
Lower Tribunal No. 18-17151
________________
Aljamar Grant,
Petitioner,
vs.
The State of Florida,
Respondent.
A Case of Original Jurisdiction – Habeas Corpus.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Jeffrey Paul DeSousa, Assistant
Public Defender, for petitioner.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant Attorney
General, for respondent.
Before LAGOA, LOGUE, and SCALES, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Aljamar Grant, the Defendant in a criminal case, petitions for a writ of
habeas corpus to quash a bench warrant for his arrest. Based upon the State’s
commendable confession of error, we grant the petition and quash the bench
warrant immediately, notwithstanding the filing of any post-opinion motions. Cruz
v. State,
822 So. 2d 595, 596 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (“[W]e conclude that the
defendant was not given a sufficiently clear notice that her personal appearance
would be required in court, notwithstanding that she had executed a written waiver
of appearance.”).
Where no bench warrant has been issued, but the trial court refused to
undertake the ministerial act of accepting the defendant’s waiver of presence, the
proper remedy is a writ of mandamus, but here, where the bench warrant has
already issued, the proper remedy is a writ of habeas corpus.
Id. at 596 & n.2
(citations omitted).
Petition granted.
2