Filed: Apr. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED JEFFREY KRISE, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D17-2809 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed April 13, 2018 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, Marlene M. Alva, Judge. James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Kristen D. Dukes, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahas
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED JEFFREY KRISE, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D17-2809 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed April 13, 2018 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, Marlene M. Alva, Judge. James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Kristen D. Dukes, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahass..
More
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
JEFFREY KRISE,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D17-2809
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed April 13, 2018
Appeal from the Circuit Court
for Seminole County,
Marlene M. Alva, Judge.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and
Kristen D. Dukes, Assistant Public
Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,
Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock
McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General,
Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See State v. Reinpold,
824 N.W.2d 713, 723 (Neb. 2013) (holding
that although the State must “make the judgment as to whether to present expert
testimony regarding the age of actors in alleged child pornography, it is a question of fact
for the jury to decide whether the actors in alleged child pornography are under the age
of 18” and noting that the “State may indeed risk losing the case by not presenting expert
testimony regarding such, but ultimately, it is for the jury to decide, with or without an
expert’s opinion, whether the evidence exhibits child pornography”).
LAMBERT, EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
2