Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Jeffrey Krise v. State, 5D17-2809 (2018)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 5D17-2809 Visitors: 6
Filed: Apr. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED JEFFREY KRISE, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D17-2809 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed April 13, 2018 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, Marlene M. Alva, Judge. James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Kristen D. Dukes, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahas
More
         IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                              FIFTH DISTRICT

                                                  NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
                                                  FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
                                                  DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED


JEFFREY KRISE,

              Appellant,

 v.                                                      Case No. 5D17-2809

STATE OF FLORIDA,

              Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed April 13, 2018

Appeal from the Circuit Court
for Seminole County,
Marlene M. Alva, Judge.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and
Kristen D. Dukes, Assistant Public
Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,
Tallahassee, and Rebecca       Rock
McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General,
Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


PER CURIAM.

       AFFIRMED. See State v. Reinpold, 
824 N.W.2d 713
, 723 (Neb. 2013) (holding

that although the State must “make the judgment as to whether to present expert

testimony regarding the age of actors in alleged child pornography, it is a question of fact

for the jury to decide whether the actors in alleged child pornography are under the age
of 18” and noting that the “State may indeed risk losing the case by not presenting expert

testimony regarding such, but ultimately, it is for the jury to decide, with or without an

expert’s opinion, whether the evidence exhibits child pornography”).


LAMBERT, EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.




                                            2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer