Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Evans v. Miller, 5D17-4090 (2018)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 5D17-4090 Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 08, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED KRISTY ANN EVANS, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D17-4090 DAVID EDWARD MILLER, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed October 12, 2018 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County, Jennifer Bass, Judge. Kristy Ann Evans, Fort Lauderdale, pro se. Linda A. Wagner, of Middleton & Middleton, P.A., Melrose, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. The former wife, Kristy
More
         IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                              FIFTH DISTRICT

                                               NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
                                               FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
                                               DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

KRISTY ANN EVANS,

             Appellant,

 v.                                                   Case No. 5D17-4090

DAVID EDWARD MILLER,

             Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed October 12, 2018

Appeal from the Circuit Court
for Marion County,
Jennifer Bass, Judge.

Kristy Ann Evans, Fort Lauderdale,
pro se.

Linda A. Wagner, of Middleton &
Middleton, P.A., Melrose, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

      The former wife, Kristy Ann Evans, appeals the trial court’s order granting the

former husband’s, David Edward Miller, supplemental petition to modify timesharing, the

parenting plan, and child support. The former wife argues that we “should revisit the

issues” to determine whether the trial court properly granted the former husband’s

supplemental petition.

      Because we do not have a transcript of the proceedings below, we cannot address

the former wife’s contention that the trial court’s decision on the issues is without
evidentiary support. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 
377 So. 2d 1150
,

1152 (Fla. 1979). Thus, we must affirm unless the former wife can demonstrate that

“fundamental error appears on the face of the appealed order.” Murphy v. Murphy, 
948 So. 2d 864
, 865 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). The former wife has made no such showing in this

case.

        AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, EVANDER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer