Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Junior Joseph v. State, 5D18-511 (2018)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 5D18-511 Visitors: 26
Filed: May 21, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED JUNIOR JOSEPH, Petitioner, v. Case No. 5D18-511 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. _/ Opinion filed May 25, 2018 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, A Case of Original Jurisdiction. Junior Joseph, pro se, Milton. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
More
      IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
      FIFTH DISTRICT

                                                  NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
                                                  FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
                                                  DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED


JUNIOR JOSEPH,

              Petitioner,

 v.                                                      Case No. 5D18-511

STATE OF FLORIDA,

              Respondent.

________________________________/

Opinion filed May 25, 2018

Petition for Writ of Habeas
Corpus, A Case of Original
Jurisdiction.

Junior Joseph, pro se, Milton.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,
Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport,
Assistant Attorney General, Daytona
Beach, for Appellee.


PER CURIAM.

       It appears from the record that a question was raised regarding Petitioner’s

competency to proceed to trial. Although the record indicates that the trial court appointed

experts to evaluate Petitioner and held a competency hearing, it did not enter an order

adjudicating Petitioner competent. On the face of the record, appellate counsel was

ineffective for not addressing this issue in Petitioner’s direct appeal. Accordingly, we
grant the petition for writ of habeas corpus and remand this cause to the trial court to

attempt to make a retroactive competency determination, if possible, or, failing which, to

grant Petitioner a new trial once he is competent to proceed. See Camacho v. State, 
225 So. 3d 272
(Fla. 4th DCA 2017).

      We deny the petition as to all other grounds.

      PETITION GRANTED and CASE REMANDED.


SAWAYA, ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.




                                            2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer