Filed: Feb. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _ No. 1D17-2151 _ DYCK-O'NEAL, INC., Appellant, v. ALICE CISLO, Appellee. _ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Taylor County. Gregory S. Parker, Judge. February 5, 2019 ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT PER CURIAM. The Florida Supreme Court has quashed the decision in this case and remanded with instructions that we reconsider the matter in light of its decision in Dyck-O’Neal, Inc. v. Lanham, 43 Fla. L. Weekly S278 (Fla. July 5, 2018). In
Summary: FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _ No. 1D17-2151 _ DYCK-O'NEAL, INC., Appellant, v. ALICE CISLO, Appellee. _ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Taylor County. Gregory S. Parker, Judge. February 5, 2019 ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT PER CURIAM. The Florida Supreme Court has quashed the decision in this case and remanded with instructions that we reconsider the matter in light of its decision in Dyck-O’Neal, Inc. v. Lanham, 43 Fla. L. Weekly S278 (Fla. July 5, 2018). In ..
More
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D17-2151 _____________________________ DYCK-O'NEAL, INC., Appellant, v. ALICE CISLO, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Taylor County. Gregory S. Parker, Judge. February 5, 2019 ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT PER CURIAM. The Florida Supreme Court has quashed the decision in this case and remanded with instructions that we reconsider the matter in light of its decision in Dyck-O’Neal, Inc. v. Lanham, 43 Fla. L. Weekly S278 (Fla. July 5, 2018). In compliance with the Florida Supreme Court's directive, we reverse the trial court’s dismissal order and remand this case for determination on the merits of Dyck-O’Neal’s deficiency claim. REVERSED and REMANDED. B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and LEWIS and MAKAR, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Susan B. Morrison, of Law Offices of Susan B. Morrison, P.A., and David M. Snyder, of David M. Snyder, and Joshua D. Moore, of Law Offices of Daniel C. Consuegra, Tampa, for Appellant. James Dale Gibson, of Gibson, Kohl, Wolff & Hric, P.L., Sarasota, for Appellee. 2
