Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

CHRISTOPHER C. CIHAK v. TAMMY M. CIHAK, 18-1767 (2019)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 18-1767 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jan. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT CHRISTOPHER C. CIHAK, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-1767 ) TAMMY M. CIHAK, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed January 23, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Chris M. LaBruzzo, Judge. Charles D. Radeline of Radeline Law Firm, PLC, Palm Harbor, for Appellant. No appearance for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Af
More
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT CHRISTOPHER C. CIHAK, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-1767 ) TAMMY M. CIHAK, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed January 23, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Chris M. LaBruzzo, Judge. Charles D. Radeline of Radeline Law Firm, PLC, Palm Harbor, for Appellant. No appearance for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. KHOUZAM, BLACK, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer