Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

ROBERT SIMEONE v. STATE OF FLORIDA, 18-3470 (2019)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 18-3470 Visitors: 19
Filed: Jul. 31, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT ROBERT SIMEONE, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. No. 4D18-3470 [July 31, 2019] Petition for writ of mandamus to the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Ted S. Booras, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2017CF002660MB. Jeremy J. Kroll of Dutko & Kroll, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Picard, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach,
More
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT ROBERT SIMEONE, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. No. 4D18-3470 [July 31, 2019] Petition for writ of mandamus to the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Ted S. Booras, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2017CF002660MB. Jeremy J. Kroll of Dutko & Kroll, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Picard, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for respondent. ON PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR REHEARING, REHEARING EN BANC, AND CERTIFICATION AS A MATTER OF GREAT PUBLIC IMPORTANCE GERBER, J. We deny the petitioner’s motion for rehearing and rehearing en banc. However, we grant the petitioner’s motion for certification as a matter of great public importance. We certify the following question of great public importance: Is a defendant who satisfies the criteria for eligibility into veterans’ court as stated in section 948.08(7), Florida Statutes (2018), entitled to admission into veterans’ court, or does a judge have discretion to deny an otherwise eligible defendant’s admission into veterans’ court on a case-by-case basis, based on factors such as the nature of the defendant’s charges and the defendant’s possible sentences, as long as the judge does not apply any kind of blanket policy, rules, or criteria, in addition to those set forth in section 948.08(7)? GROSS and CONNER, JJ., concur. * * * No further motions for rehearing shall be permitted. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer