Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ROYCE GOLDSMITH v. STATE OF FLORIDA, 19-0792 (2019)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 19-0792 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jul. 10, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT ROYCE GOLDSMITH, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. Nos. 4D18-3446 and 4D19-792 [July 10, 2019] Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Ernest A. Kollra, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 08-2288 CF10A, 09-6184 CF10A and 11-17276 CF10A. Royce Peter Goldsmith, Arcadia, pro se. No appearance required by appellee. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Bro
More
       DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                                FOURTH DISTRICT

                          ROYCE GOLDSMITH,
                              Appellant,

                                      v.

                          STATE OF FLORIDA,
                               Appellee.

                      Nos. 4D18-3446 and 4D19-792

                                [July 10, 2019]

   Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County;
Ernest A. Kollra, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 08-2288 CF10A, 09-6184
CF10A and 11-17276 CF10A.

   Royce Peter Goldsmith, Arcadia, pro se.

   No appearance required by appellee.

PER CURIAM.

   Affirmed. See Brooks v. State, 
969 So. 2d 238
, 243 (Fla. 2007) (“[F]or
motions filed under rule 3.800(a), we hold that if the trial court could have
imposed the same sentence using a correct scoresheet, any error was
harmless.”).

WARNER, CIKLIN and FORST, JJ., concur.

                            *          *          *

   Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer