Filed: May 21, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _ No. 1D19-1333 _ VICTOR HICKS, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARK S. INCH, Respondent. _ Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction. May 21, 2019 PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits. See Clark v. Nichols M. N. P., 225 So. 3d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (holding that to be entitled to mandamus relief compelling a ruling on a pending matter, a petitioner must demonstrate that he has noticed
Summary: FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _ No. 1D19-1333 _ VICTOR HICKS, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARK S. INCH, Respondent. _ Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction. May 21, 2019 PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits. See Clark v. Nichols M. N. P., 225 So. 3d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (holding that to be entitled to mandamus relief compelling a ruling on a pending matter, a petitioner must demonstrate that he has noticed t..
More
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D19-1333
_____________________________
VICTOR HICKS,
Petitioner,
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, MARK S. INCH,
Respondent.
_____________________________
Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.
May 21, 2019
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits.
See Clark v. Nichols M. N. P., 225 So. 3d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017)
(holding that to be entitled to mandamus relief compelling a ruling
on a pending matter, a petitioner must demonstrate that he has
noticed the matter for hearing in the lower tribunal).
ROBERTS, RAY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
Victor Hicks, pro se, Petitioner.
Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, Department of Corrections,
Tallahassee, for Respondent.
2
