Filed: Sep. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _ No. 1D19-2640 _ THEODORE J. THOMPSON, Appellant, v. ADMIRAL MANUFACTURING HOUSING COMMUNITY; BRANDI PARKER, Appellees. _ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Gary L. Bergosh, Judge. September 20, 2019 PER CURIAM. DISMISSED. Dedge v. Crosby, 914 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (holding mere phrase "with prejudice" does not make a final order of an order merely granting a motion); Johnson v. First City Bank of Gainesville, 491 So.
Summary: FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _ No. 1D19-2640 _ THEODORE J. THOMPSON, Appellant, v. ADMIRAL MANUFACTURING HOUSING COMMUNITY; BRANDI PARKER, Appellees. _ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Gary L. Bergosh, Judge. September 20, 2019 PER CURIAM. DISMISSED. Dedge v. Crosby, 914 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (holding mere phrase "with prejudice" does not make a final order of an order merely granting a motion); Johnson v. First City Bank of Gainesville, 491 So. 2..
More
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D19-2640
_____________________________
THEODORE J. THOMPSON,
Appellant,
v.
ADMIRAL MANUFACTURING
HOUSING COMMUNITY; BRANDI
PARKER,
Appellees.
_____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.
Gary L. Bergosh, Judge.
September 20, 2019
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. Dedge v. Crosby, 914 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 1st DCA
2005) (holding mere phrase "with prejudice" does not make a final
order of an order merely granting a motion); Johnson v. First City
Bank of Gainesville,
491 So. 2d 1217 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (holding
that an order granting a motion to dismiss with prejudice is “an
order granting a motion, not an order dismissing the action” and
is not final or appealable).
ROWE, OSTERHAUS, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
Theodore J. Thompson, pro se, Appellant.
No appearance for Appellees.
2
