EVANS v. STATE, 49 So.3d 1286 (2010)
Court: Court of Appeals of Florida
Number: inflco20101229224
Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 29, 2010
Latest Update: Dec. 29, 2010
Summary: On Motion for Rehearing PER CURIAM. The defendant has filed a motion for rehearing. He argues this court may have overlooked two remaining issues raised in his initial brief concerning the motion for judgment of acquittal and the defendant's enhanced sentence. This court has considered those issues and finds them moot in light of our reversal and remand for a new trial where those issues can be addressed first by the trial court. We therefore deny the motion for rehearing. FARMER, MAY and
Summary: On Motion for Rehearing PER CURIAM. The defendant has filed a motion for rehearing. He argues this court may have overlooked two remaining issues raised in his initial brief concerning the motion for judgment of acquittal and the defendant's enhanced sentence. This court has considered those issues and finds them moot in light of our reversal and remand for a new trial where those issues can be addressed first by the trial court. We therefore deny the motion for rehearing. FARMER, MAY and ..
More
On Motion for Rehearing
PER CURIAM.
The defendant has filed a motion for rehearing. He argues this court may have overlooked two remaining issues raised in his initial brief concerning the motion for judgment of acquittal and the defendant's enhanced sentence. This court has considered those issues and finds them moot in light of our reversal and remand for a new trial where those issues can be addressed first by the trial court. We therefore deny the motion for rehearing.
FARMER, MAY and GERBER, JJ., concur.
Source: Leagle
