CIARLETTA v. STATE, 54 So.3d 1039 (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals of Florida
Number: inflco20110209290
Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 25, 2011
Latest Update: Mar. 25, 2011
Summary: PER CURIAM. We affirm the denial of appellant's Rule 3.850 motion. The State, however, concedes that the judgment contains a scrivener's error. We remand for entry of a corrected judgment which properly identifies the offense to which appellant pleaded. STEVENSON, CIKLIN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the denial of appellant's Rule 3.850 motion. The State, however, concedes that the judgment contains a scrivener's error. We remand for entry of a corrected judgment which properly identifies the offense to which appellant pleaded.
STEVENSON, CIKLIN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
Source: Leagle
