SKIBA v. STATE, 67 So.3d 337 (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals of Florida
Number: inflco20110713197
Filed: Aug. 24, 2011
Latest Update: Aug. 24, 2011
Summary: PER CURIAM. The defendant appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm. However, we remand the case to the trial court to correct a scrivener's error. The trial court announced that the defendant's sentences would run concurrent, but the sentence on Count IV fails to reflect that information. Affirmed, but remanded to correct a scrivener's error. MAY, C.J., GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
PER CURIAM.
The defendant appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm. However, we remand the case to the trial court to correct a scrivener's error. The trial court announced that the defendant's sentences would run concurrent, but the sentence on Count IV fails to reflect that information.
Affirmed, but remanded to correct a scrivener's error.
MAY, C.J., GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
Source: Leagle