K.J. v. STATE, 84 So.3d 1285 (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals of Florida
Number: inflco20120425260
Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 25, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 25, 2012
Summary: ON CONFESSION OF ERROR PER CURIAM. On this appeal from a restitution order entered after a plea to burglary, the State concedes, and we agree, that the trial court reversibly erred in failing to grant a brief continuance so that the assistant public defender assigned to the case could appear and instead forcing the respondent to be represented by two other assistants who were entirely unfamiliar with the case. See M.F. v. State, 920 So.2d 1252 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). Accordingly, the order un
Summary: ON CONFESSION OF ERROR PER CURIAM. On this appeal from a restitution order entered after a plea to burglary, the State concedes, and we agree, that the trial court reversibly erred in failing to grant a brief continuance so that the assistant public defender assigned to the case could appear and instead forcing the respondent to be represented by two other assistants who were entirely unfamiliar with the case. See M.F. v. State, 920 So.2d 1252 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). Accordingly, the order und..
More
ON CONFESSION OF ERROR
PER CURIAM.
On this appeal from a restitution order entered after a plea to burglary, the State concedes, and we agree, that the trial court reversibly erred in failing to grant a brief continuance so that the assistant public defender assigned to the case could appear and instead forcing the respondent to be represented by two other assistants who were entirely unfamiliar with the case. See M.F. v. State, 920 So.2d 1252 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). Accordingly, the order under review is reversed for a new restitution hearing.1
Reversed and remanded.
FootNotes
1. This holding moots the other issues raised on appeal.
Source: Leagle
