STEVENS v. ESCOBAR-TRINIDAD, 100 So.3d 1248 (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals of Florida
Number: inflco20121116196
Visitors: 5
Filed: Nov. 16, 2012
Latest Update: Nov. 16, 2012
Summary: MORRIS, Judge. Teresa L. Stevens and Tiffany S. Stevens appeal a nonfinal order in circuit court case number 2010-CA-007825 directing them to respond to a counterclaim. We affirm that order without comment. The Stevenses also appeal a nonfinal order in circuit court case number 2010-CA-022015 directing them to file an answer. 1 However, circuit court case number 2010-CA-022015 had already been voluntarily dismissed by the appellees, Mayra Escobar-Trinidad and Jorge Soto-Lopez, at the time the
Summary: MORRIS, Judge. Teresa L. Stevens and Tiffany S. Stevens appeal a nonfinal order in circuit court case number 2010-CA-007825 directing them to respond to a counterclaim. We affirm that order without comment. The Stevenses also appeal a nonfinal order in circuit court case number 2010-CA-022015 directing them to file an answer. 1 However, circuit court case number 2010-CA-022015 had already been voluntarily dismissed by the appellees, Mayra Escobar-Trinidad and Jorge Soto-Lopez, at the time the c..
More
MORRIS, Judge.
Teresa L. Stevens and Tiffany S. Stevens appeal a nonfinal order in circuit court case number 2010-CA-007825 directing them to respond to a counterclaim. We affirm that order without comment. The Stevenses also appeal a nonfinal order in circuit court case number 2010-CA-022015 directing them to file an answer.1 However, circuit court case number 2010-CA-022015 had already been voluntarily dismissed by the appellees, Mayra Escobar-Trinidad and Jorge Soto-Lopez, at the time the circuit court entered the order. The circuit court thus lacked in personam jurisdiction over the Stevenses in that case. See Biggers v. Town of Davie, 674 So.2d 938, 939 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). Accordingly, the order in circuit court case number 2010-CA-022015 directing the Stevenses to file an answer is reversed.
Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
KELLY and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.
FootNotes
1. The two orders on appeal effectively determine the jurisdiction over the Stevenses. Thus we have jurisdiction pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(i).
Source: Leagle
