CORDOVES v. CORDOVES, 105 So.3d 591 (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals of Florida
Number: inflco20121226137
Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 26, 2012
Latest Update: Dec. 26, 2012
Summary: PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 , 1152 (Fla.1979)("When there are issues of fact the appellant necessarily asks the reviewing court to draw conclusions about the evidence. Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court cannot properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory."); see also Fla. R.App. P. 9.200(b)(4) (20
Summary: PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 , 1152 (Fla.1979)("When there are issues of fact the appellant necessarily asks the reviewing court to draw conclusions about the evidence. Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court cannot properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory."); see also Fla. R.App. P. 9.200(b)(4) (201..
More
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979)("When there are issues of fact the appellant necessarily asks the reviewing court to draw conclusions about the evidence. Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court cannot properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory."); see also Fla. R.App. P. 9.200(b)(4) (2012) (providing a method for preparing a statement of the evidence and proceedings when a transcript is unavailable).
Source: Leagle
