Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

SOFFER v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO CO., 106 So.3d 465 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals of Florida Number: inflco20130102119 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jan. 02, 2013
Latest Update: Jan. 02, 2013
Summary: ON APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR REHEARING OR REHEARING EN BANC AND APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OR REHEARING PER CURIAM. In our original opinion, we affirmed the cross-appeal without comment. We grant rehearing to clarify that we affirm R.J. Reynolds's third issue on appeal — namely, whether the trial court's application of factual findings established in Engle violated R.J. Reynolds's due process rights — on the authority of R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Mart
More

ON APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR REHEARING OR REHEARING EN BANC AND APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

In our original opinion, we affirmed the cross-appeal without comment. We grant rehearing to clarify that we affirm R.J. Reynolds's third issue on appeal — namely, whether the trial court's application of factual findings established in Engle violated R.J. Reynolds's due process rights — on the authority of R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Martin, 53 So.3d 1060 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010), review denied, 67 So.3d 1050 (2011), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 132 S.Ct. 1794, 182 L.Ed.2d 617 (2012), and Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Douglas, 83 So.3d 1002 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012), review granted, No. SC12-617 (2012). We otherwise deny rehearing, rehearing en banc, and certification.

DAVIS, LEWIS, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer