SOUTHEAST FISH AND SEAFOOD CO. v. CADENA, 106 So.3d 1009 (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals of Florida
Number: inflco20130220232
Visitors: 4
Filed: Feb. 20, 2013
Latest Update: Feb. 20, 2013
Summary: PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See, e.g., Pariz v. Colon, 77 So.3d 721 , 722 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding that a trial court had in rem jurisdiction over property situated within the county); Griveas v. Amoco Oil Co., 854 So.2d 841 , 843 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) ("Only the circuit court in the county where the real property is located has in rem jurisdiction.").
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See, e.g., Pariz v. Colon, 77 So.3d 721, 722 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding that a trial court had in rem jurisdiction over property situated within the county); Griveas v. Amoco Oil Co., 854 So.2d 841, 843 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) ("Only the circuit court in the county where the real property is located has in rem jurisdiction.").
Source: Leagle
