CALDWELL v. STATE, 118 So.3d 285 (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals of Florida
Number: inflco20130726133
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jul. 26, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 26, 2013
Summary: PER CURIAM. We affirm the appellant's judgment and sentence, but do so without prejudice to the appellant's right to file a rule 3.850 or 3.800(a) motion seeking additional credit. See Hope v. State, ___ So.3d ___ (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (holding, even if claims were meritorious, appellant did not preserve sentencing claims for appellate review through contemporaneous objection or 3.800 motion). AFFIRMED. BENTON, THOMAS, and CLARK, JJ., concur.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the appellant's judgment and sentence, but do so without prejudice to the appellant's right to file a rule 3.850 or 3.800(a) motion seeking additional credit. See Hope v. State, ___ So.3d ___ (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (holding, even if claims were meritorious, appellant did not preserve sentencing claims for appellate review through contemporaneous objection or 3.800 motion).
AFFIRMED.
BENTON, THOMAS, and CLARK, JJ., concur.
Source: Leagle
