COLLINS v. STATE, 123 So.3d 654 (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals of Florida
Number: inflco20131009154
Visitors: 20
Filed: Oct. 09, 2013
Latest Update: Oct. 09, 2013
Summary: PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See McDuffie v. State, 970 So.2d 312 , 323 n. 2 (Fla.2007); Cooper v. State, 45 So.3d 490 , 494 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (affirming trial court's exclusion of reverse Williams rule evidence where the "similar fact evidence" "was overly general and did not meet the `close similarity of facts, a unique or fingerprint type of information' test for relevancy"); Neals v. State, 972 So.2d 1047 , 1048 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). GROSS, MAY and FORST, JJ., concur.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See McDuffie v. State, 970 So.2d 312, 323 n. 2 (Fla.2007); Cooper v. State, 45 So.3d 490, 494 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (affirming trial court's exclusion of reverse Williams rule evidence where the "similar fact evidence" "was overly general and did not meet the `close similarity of facts, a unique or fingerprint type of information' test for relevancy"); Neals v. State, 972 So.2d 1047, 1048 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).
GROSS, MAY and FORST, JJ., concur.
Source: Leagle
