SYDORIAK v. STATE, 162 So.3d 111 (2014)
Court: Court of Appeals of Florida
Number: inflco20141015163
Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 15, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 15, 2014
Summary: PER CURIAM . The defendant appeals the trial court's summary denial of multiple claims for post-conviction relief under rule 3.850, and the denial of two other claims after an evidentiary hearing. We reverse and remand the case. The trial court shall allow the defendant a reasonable time to file an amended motion that meets the pleading requirements of Alcorn v. State, 121 So.3d 419 (Fla.2013), as to Claim 1 N only, if he can do so in good faith. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(3); see a
Summary: PER CURIAM . The defendant appeals the trial court's summary denial of multiple claims for post-conviction relief under rule 3.850, and the denial of two other claims after an evidentiary hearing. We reverse and remand the case. The trial court shall allow the defendant a reasonable time to file an amended motion that meets the pleading requirements of Alcorn v. State, 121 So.3d 419 (Fla.2013), as to Claim 1 N only, if he can do so in good faith. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(3); see al..
More
PER CURIAM.
The defendant appeals the trial court's summary denial of multiple claims for post-conviction relief under rule 3.850, and the denial of two other claims after an evidentiary hearing. We reverse and remand the case. The trial court shall allow the defendant a reasonable time to file an amended motion that meets the pleading requirements of Alcorn v. State, 121 So.3d 419 (Fla.2013), as to Claim 1 N only, if he can do so in good faith. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(3); see also Ramos v. State, 141 So.3d 643 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). We affirm the case in all other respects.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
DAMOORGIAN, C.J., MAY and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
Source: Leagle