PARHAM v. STATE, 149 So.3d 754 (2014)
Court: Court of Appeals of Florida
Number: inflco20141105135
Visitors: 3
Filed: Nov. 05, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 05, 2014
Summary: PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Ferguson v. State, 789 So.2d 306 , 314-15 (Fla.2001) (affirming trial court's finding of competency where court's rejection of defense experts' opinions was supported by testimony of three doctors who found evidence of malingering and by testimony of corrections officers that defendant only acted irrationally shortly before and after mental evaluations).
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Ferguson v. State, 789 So.2d 306, 314-15 (Fla.2001) (affirming trial court's finding of competency where court's rejection of defense experts' opinions was supported by testimony of three doctors who found evidence of malingering and by testimony of corrections officers that defendant only acted irrationally shortly before and after mental evaluations).
Source: Leagle
