SEARCY DENNEY SCAROLA BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. v. STATE, 190 So.3d 120 (2015)
Court: Court of Appeals of Florida
Number: inflco20150917267
Visitors: 21
Filed: Sep. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 16, 2015
Summary: ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OF QUESTIONS OF GREAT PUBLIC IMPORTANCE PER CURIAM . We grant Appellants' July 27, 2015 Motion for Certification of Questions of Great Public Importance and certify the following question to the Florida Supreme Court: AFTER THE ENACTMENT OF SECTION 768.28, FLORIDA STATUTES, AND THE ADOPTION OF FLORIDA SENATE RULE 4.81(6), IS IT CONSTITUTIONALLY PERMISSIBLE FOR THE FLORIDA LEGISLATURE TO LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF ATTORNEYS' FEES PAID FROM A GUARDIANSHIP TRUST ESTABLISH
Summary: ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OF QUESTIONS OF GREAT PUBLIC IMPORTANCE PER CURIAM . We grant Appellants' July 27, 2015 Motion for Certification of Questions of Great Public Importance and certify the following question to the Florida Supreme Court: AFTER THE ENACTMENT OF SECTION 768.28, FLORIDA STATUTES, AND THE ADOPTION OF FLORIDA SENATE RULE 4.81(6), IS IT CONSTITUTIONALLY PERMISSIBLE FOR THE FLORIDA LEGISLATURE TO LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF ATTORNEYS' FEES PAID FROM A GUARDIANSHIP TRUST ESTABLISHE..
More
ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OF QUESTIONS OF GREAT PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
PER CURIAM.
We grant Appellants' July 27, 2015 Motion for Certification of Questions of Great Public Importance and certify the following question to the Florida Supreme Court:
AFTER THE ENACTMENT OF SECTION 768.28, FLORIDA STATUTES, AND THE ADOPTION OF FLORIDA SENATE RULE 4.81(6), IS IT CONSTITUTIONALLY PERMISSIBLE FOR THE FLORIDA LEGISLATURE TO LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF ATTORNEYS' FEES PAID FROM A GUARDIANSHIP TRUST ESTABLISHED BY A LEGISLATIVE CLAIMS BILL?
CIKLIN, C.J., CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.
Source: Leagle
