THE FLORIDA HORSEMEN'S BENEVOLENT & PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, 283 So.3d 1287 (2019)
Court: Court of Appeals of Florida
Number: inflco20191205181
Visitors: 34
Filed: Dec. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 05, 2019
Summary: Per Curiam . Because Petitioner has not shown irreparable injury that cannot be adequately remedied on appeal, we dismiss the petition for review of non-final agency action for lack of jurisdiction. State v. Planned Parenthood of Sw. & Cent. Fla., Inc., 207 So.3d 1032 , 1034 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) ("In deciding whether to grant review of a non-final agency action, showing irreparable injury is a jurisdictional hurdle that we address `before determining whether the [ruling] departed from the e
Summary: Per Curiam . Because Petitioner has not shown irreparable injury that cannot be adequately remedied on appeal, we dismiss the petition for review of non-final agency action for lack of jurisdiction. State v. Planned Parenthood of Sw. & Cent. Fla., Inc., 207 So.3d 1032 , 1034 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) ("In deciding whether to grant review of a non-final agency action, showing irreparable injury is a jurisdictional hurdle that we address `before determining whether the [ruling] departed from the es..
More
Per Curiam.
Because Petitioner has not shown irreparable injury that cannot be adequately remedied on appeal, we dismiss the petition for review of non-final agency action for lack of jurisdiction. State v. Planned Parenthood of Sw. & Cent. Fla., Inc., 207 So.3d 1032, 1034 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) ("In deciding whether to grant review of a non-final agency action, showing irreparable injury is a jurisdictional hurdle that we address `before determining whether the [ruling] departed from the essential requirements of law.'") (quoting AVCO Corp. v. Neff, 30 So.3d 597, 601 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)).
DISMISSED.
Roberts, Makar, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.
Source: Leagle
