Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

PEPPERWOOD OF NAPLES CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, 2:10-cv-753-FtM-99SPC. (2012)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20120215722 Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 14, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 14, 2012
Summary: ORDER SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, Magistrate Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the Plaintiff Pepperwood of Naples Condominium Association, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion to Remove Inadvertently Filed Confidential Documents from the Court File and CM/ECF Docket 58-1 and 2 (Doc. #59) filed on February 14, 2012. The Plaintiff inadvertently attached confidential information. (Doc. # 58, Exhibits 1&2) and now moves the Court to remove the confidential information from the Court's docket sheet. Pur
More

ORDER

SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, Magistrate Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the Plaintiff Pepperwood of Naples Condominium Association, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion to Remove Inadvertently Filed Confidential Documents from the Court File and CM/ECF Docket 58-1 and 2 (Doc. #59) filed on February 14, 2012. The Plaintiff inadvertently attached confidential information. (Doc. # 58, Exhibits 1&2) and now moves the Court to remove the confidential information from the Court's docket sheet. Pursuant to M.D. Fla. Local Rule 3.01(g), the Plaintiff conferred with the Defendant who does not oppose the Motion.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

The Plaintiff Pepperwood of Naples Condominium Association, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion to Remove Inadvertently Filed Confidential Documents from the Court's File and CM/ECF Docket 58-1 and 2 (Doc. #59) is GRANTED.

(1) The Clerk of the Court is directed to remove Exhibit 58-1 the Expert Report of Charles M. Miller, and Exhibit 58-2 the Expert Report of Peter M. Occhialini from CM/ECF.

(2) The inadvertent disclosure of these reports does not destroy the confidential nature of the documents.

(3) Any third-parties who reviewed the documents prior to removal from the Court's file and CM/ECF docket are subject to the Mutual Protective Order Regarding Confidentiality entered by this Court on October 20, 2011. [DE. 49].

DONE AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer