NU IMAGE, INC. v. DOES 1-3,932, 2:11-cv-545-FtM-29SPC. (2012)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20120404938
Visitors: 6
Filed: Apr. 03, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 03, 2012
Summary: ORDER SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, Magistrate Judge. This matter comes before the Court on a letter submitted to the Court by John Doe Defendant #301 (Doc. #87) filed on April 2, 2012. The Court will strike the letter as it does not accept letters from pro se parties. If movant would like to request relief from this Court, he must do so in a Motion setting forth the legal grounds upon which relief may be granted. The Court is mindful that any rulings from this Court cannot be sent to John Doe #
Summary: ORDER SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, Magistrate Judge. This matter comes before the Court on a letter submitted to the Court by John Doe Defendant #301 (Doc. #87) filed on April 2, 2012. The Court will strike the letter as it does not accept letters from pro se parties. If movant would like to request relief from this Court, he must do so in a Motion setting forth the legal grounds upon which relief may be granted. The Court is mindful that any rulings from this Court cannot be sent to John Doe #3..
More
ORDER
SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, Magistrate Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on a letter submitted to the Court by John Doe Defendant #301 (Doc. #87) filed on April 2, 2012. The Court will strike the letter as it does not accept letters from pro se parties. If movant would like to request relief from this Court, he must do so in a Motion setting forth the legal grounds upon which relief may be granted.
The Court is mindful that any rulings from this Court cannot be sent to John Doe #301's attention because his home address is unknown and the basis of his objection to the subpoena is that he should not be required to provide it. But by John Doe not providing an address to the Court, he does so to his own detriment as the Defendant will not have the opportunity to object to the Court's rulings. The Court cannot defend the case on John Doe's behalf, though, as it is Defendant's responsibility to provide the Court with a mailing address if he wishes to stay apprised of filings in this matter. The Court cannot inform litigants about case matters if a party refuses to provide an address.
Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED:
John Doe #301's Letter submitted to the Court (Doc. #87) is STRICKEN.
DONE AND ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
