BARLOW v. WALGREEN CO., 8:11-cv-71-T-30EAJ. (2012)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20120413689
Visitors: 14
Filed: Apr. 12, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 12, 2012
Summary: ORDER JAMES S. MOODY, Jr., District Judge. THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration (Dkt. 41) of this Court's Order denying Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 40). In its motion, Defendant simply re-hashes the arguments made in its earlier Motion for Summary Judgment, arguments which this Court rejected. As a result, this Court concludes that Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration should be denied. It is therefore ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that De
Summary: ORDER JAMES S. MOODY, Jr., District Judge. THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration (Dkt. 41) of this Court's Order denying Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 40). In its motion, Defendant simply re-hashes the arguments made in its earlier Motion for Summary Judgment, arguments which this Court rejected. As a result, this Court concludes that Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration should be denied. It is therefore ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Def..
More
ORDER
JAMES S. MOODY, Jr., District Judge.
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration (Dkt. 41) of this Court's Order denying Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 40). In its motion, Defendant simply re-hashes the arguments made in its earlier Motion for Summary Judgment, arguments which this Court rejected. As a result, this Court concludes that Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration should be denied.
It is therefore ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration (Dkt. 41) is hereby denied.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
