HATFIELD v. A+ NURSETEMPS, INC., 5:11-cv-416-Oc-10TBS. (2012)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20120426920
Visitors: 6
Filed: Apr. 25, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 25, 2012
Summary: ORDER THOMAS B. SMITH, District Judge. Pending before the Court are Defendant's Motion to Strike Amended Complaint or, Alternatively, Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Amended Complaint (Doc. 31) and Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant's Motion to Strike Amended Complaint (Doc. 35). Upon due consideration: 1. The Defendant's motion to strike is DENIED. 2. The Defendant's motion for an enlargement of time is GRANTED. The Defendant has ten days from the rendition of this Ord
Summary: ORDER THOMAS B. SMITH, District Judge. Pending before the Court are Defendant's Motion to Strike Amended Complaint or, Alternatively, Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Amended Complaint (Doc. 31) and Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant's Motion to Strike Amended Complaint (Doc. 35). Upon due consideration: 1. The Defendant's motion to strike is DENIED. 2. The Defendant's motion for an enlargement of time is GRANTED. The Defendant has ten days from the rendition of this Orde..
More
ORDER
THOMAS B. SMITH, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are Defendant's Motion to Strike Amended Complaint or, Alternatively, Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Amended Complaint (Doc. 31) and Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant's Motion to Strike Amended Complaint (Doc. 35). Upon due consideration:
1. The Defendant's motion to strike is DENIED.
2. The Defendant's motion for an enlargement of time is GRANTED. The Defendant has ten days from the rendition of this Order within to respond to Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DONE AND ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
