Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

AMERITOX, LTD. v. MILLENNIUM LABORATORIES, INC., 8:11-cv-775-T-24-TBM. (2012)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20120507516 Visitors: 11
Filed: May 04, 2012
Latest Update: May 04, 2012
Summary: ORDER SUSAN C. BUCKLEW, District Judge. This cause comes before the Court on Defendant Millennium Laboratories, Inc.'s ("Millennium") Unopposed Motion for Leave to File a Forthcoming Motion for Summary Judgment Under Seal (Doc. No. 100). Millennium requests leave of Court to file its motion for summary judgment and all exhibits thereto under seal. Millennium notes that the Court entered a Stipulation of Confidentiality and Protective Order on November 28, 2011 (Doc. No. 53). Pursuant to that o
More

ORDER

SUSAN C. BUCKLEW, District Judge.

This cause comes before the Court on Defendant Millennium Laboratories, Inc.'s ("Millennium") Unopposed Motion for Leave to File a Forthcoming Motion for Summary Judgment Under Seal (Doc. No. 100). Millennium requests leave of Court to file its motion for summary judgment and all exhibits thereto under seal. Millennium notes that the Court entered a Stipulation of Confidentiality and Protective Order on November 28, 2011 (Doc. No. 53). Pursuant to that order, Millennium states, the parties have designated documents and deposition transcripts as containing "Confidential," "Highly Confidential," and "Confidential Health Information." Millennium specifically cites the deposition of third-party Keith Walker — substantial portions of which Plaintiff Ameritox, LTD ("Ameritox") has designated "Highly Confidential" — as a document on which it anticipates relying in its motion for summary judgment. Given Ameritox's designation, Millennium explains, "the motion and its exhibits cannot be filed in the public record." (Doc. No. 100 at 2).

Millennium's motion is denied. First, Millennium's request to file its motion for summary judgment under seal is denied because Millennium cannot show that the motion itself needs to be filed under seal. Second, should counsel wish to file certain exhibits or portions thereof under seal, they must move for leave of Court, following the procedure set forth in Local Rule 1.09. Specifically, they must file a motion that includes: "(i) an identification and description of each item proposed for sealing;1 (ii) the reason that filing each item is necessary; (iii) the reason that sealing each item is necessary; (iv) the reason that a means other than sealing is unavailable or unsatisfactory to preserve the interest advanced by the movant in support of the seal; (v) a statement of the proposed duration of the seal; and (vi) a memorandum of legal authority supporting the seal." Local Rule 1.09(a).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Millennium's Unopposed Motion for Leave to File a Forthcoming Motion for Summary Judgment Under Seal (Doc. No. 100) is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. It is unclear from the motion whether Millennium seeks to file only Walker's deposition and the exhibits thereto under seal, or whether there are other exhibits Millennium seeks to file under seal. Furthermore, Millennium must identify each exhibit it seeks to file under seal.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer