FLAGSHIP LAKE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT NUMBER 5, LLC v. CITY OF MASCOTTE, 5:12-cv-188-Oc-10TBS. (2012)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20120508700
Visitors: 1
Filed: May 07, 2012
Latest Update: May 07, 2012
Summary: ORDER THOMAS B. SMITH, Magistrate Judge. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or to File Amended Complaint (Doc. 6). Pursuant to Local Rule 3.01(g), counsel for Plaintiff represents that the Defendants' attorney has been contacted and has no objection to the requested extension of time. Upon due consideration, Plaintiff's motion is hereby GRANTED, and Plaintiff shall have through May 21, 2012 within to resp
Summary: ORDER THOMAS B. SMITH, Magistrate Judge. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or to File Amended Complaint (Doc. 6). Pursuant to Local Rule 3.01(g), counsel for Plaintiff represents that the Defendants' attorney has been contacted and has no objection to the requested extension of time. Upon due consideration, Plaintiff's motion is hereby GRANTED, and Plaintiff shall have through May 21, 2012 within to respo..
More
ORDER
THOMAS B. SMITH, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or to File Amended Complaint (Doc. 6). Pursuant to Local Rule 3.01(g), counsel for Plaintiff represents that the Defendants' attorney has been contacted and has no objection to the requested extension of time. Upon due consideration, Plaintiff's motion is hereby GRANTED, and Plaintiff shall have through May 21, 2012 within to respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Doc. 3).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
