Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SATTERFIELD v. CFI SALES & MARKETING, INC., 6:09-cv-1827-Orl-28DAB. (2012)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20120511817 Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 17, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 17, 2012
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DAVID A. BAKER, Magistrate Judge. TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT This cause came on for consideration following a settlement conference before the undersigned on March 9, 2012. The remaining Plaintiffs/Opt-In Plaintiffs reached a settlement agreement. As reflected in the Court's approval at the conclusion of the settlement conference, the resolution of the claims is fair to the Plaintiffs. Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that the District Judge app
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

DAVID A. BAKER, Magistrate Judge.

TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

This cause came on for consideration following a settlement conference before the undersigned on March 9, 2012. The remaining Plaintiffs/Opt-In Plaintiffs reached a settlement agreement. As reflected in the Court's approval at the conclusion of the settlement conference, the resolution of the claims is fair to the Plaintiffs. Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that the District Judge approve the dismissal, direct closure of the file, and allow Plaintiffs 14 days to submit their claim for fees (to include proper certification under Local Rule 3.01 (g)).

Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations contained in this report within fourteen (14) days from the date of its filing shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking the factual findings on appeal.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer