WIAND v. DANCING $, LLC, 8:10-cv-92-T-17MAP. (2012)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20120718c16
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 18, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 18, 2012
Summary: ORDER MARK A. PIZZO, Magistrate Judge. The Receiver served on the Defendant a request for production on July 27, 2011. Dissatisfied with the Defendant's answers, the Receiver moves to compel complete responses to the document requests, and recover attorney's fees and costs associated with his motion (doc. 82). The Defendant, in turn, has not responded to the motion within the time specified by Local Rule 3.01(b), triggering the presumption that Defendant has no objection to the motion. Accord
Summary: ORDER MARK A. PIZZO, Magistrate Judge. The Receiver served on the Defendant a request for production on July 27, 2011. Dissatisfied with the Defendant's answers, the Receiver moves to compel complete responses to the document requests, and recover attorney's fees and costs associated with his motion (doc. 82). The Defendant, in turn, has not responded to the motion within the time specified by Local Rule 3.01(b), triggering the presumption that Defendant has no objection to the motion. Accordi..
More
ORDER
MARK A. PIZZO, Magistrate Judge.
The Receiver served on the Defendant a request for production on July 27, 2011. Dissatisfied with the Defendant's answers, the Receiver moves to compel complete responses to the document requests, and recover attorney's fees and costs associated with his motion (doc. 82). The Defendant, in turn, has not responded to the motion within the time specified by Local Rule 3.01(b), triggering the presumption that Defendant has no objection to the motion. Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED:
1. Given that the Receiver acknowledges in the motion that the Defendant has agreed to cooperate and is in the process of supplementing certain discovery responses and providing additional documents, coupled with the fact that I recently entered an Order extending the deadline for the completion of discovery through August 1, 2012, the Defendant is directed to produce to the Receiver on or before August 1, 2012, all responsive documents and information sought by the motion but not yet produced.
2. That part of the Receiver's motion seeking sanctions is denied without prejudice.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
